When Harry Anderson (1906-1996) set out to illustrate images from his 7th Day Adventist religious faith, he turned to photo reference to give him added realism.
Here are the photos next to the finished paintings. It's interesting to compare the changes he made as he went from the reference to the painting.
Here, Jesus is lowered from heaven to outreached human hands. The painting invents the sweep of the garment, and the warm reflected light from the back of the figure to the encircling white fabric.
This is one of Anderson's most famous religious paintings. Much of the spontaneous action and accurate eyelines came from posing the whole grouping together and actually having them walk.
Norman Rockwell didn't shoot reference this way, and would instead generally pose models separately and would set up walking poses somewhat artificially.
The potential pitfall of shooting photo reference, especially for religious paintings, is that one can get caught up in the commonplace and random details of the photo and lose sight of the mental image of the scene.
Anderson certainly didn't copy the reference, instead redrawing it, and controlling the values. Note how he downplayed the reflected light on the shadow side of the chest.
Like many other illustrators of his day, Anderson used black and white photos, not wanting to be influenced by the colors. He spared no expense or effort to get good scrap. According to his biography, a large percentage of his commission went to model expenses and photography fees.
Most of the photos he used he took and developed himself in a bedroom that he converted into a photo studio and darkroom. He used professional models—who even 50 years ago charged as much as sixty dollars an hour—but he also used neighbors and friends.
The biography says: "By posing his models in approximately the right costume and photographing them, Harry could obtain what he needed—the proper foreshortening of limbs, inclination of head, relationship of light and shadow."
Additional resources:
Illustrated bio in book form (emphasis on religious work): Harry Anderson: The Man Behind the Paintings
Previous posts:
Thanks to Jim Pinkoski and Lars Justinen for the images
8 comments:
It is interesting to see that the second example has the children in contemporary dress,and all the other paintings have period clothing. Do you know the reason for this?
He's especially skillful in making the finished paintings look like they're not a composite of photo references, which I think Rockwell was also successful at. I can't always put my finger on why some artists show their photo reference "hand" when it comes to combining references. But usually the failure seems to be a disconnect in lighting or in the misdirected focus of the gaze of the subjects.
I had to do a double-take when I saw this article, as my thoughts immediately went to my grandfather, Harry Baerg, who was also a professional illustrator working for the Seventh Day Adventists (and happened to die in 1996). Strange how many particular life details these two guys shared. However, my grandfather's focus was much more in the vein of scientific illustration and nature stories for children.
Any "slavish renditons" of photo references?
Not at all, in my opinion, just comparing those photos with Harry's final works:
Lots of liberties he takes with folds and figures and limbs; drawing away from those photographed models. Towards his very own concept of things.
Jesus! Quite successfully done, IMO.
Since we're talking Jesus paintings...
James, you got any knowledge to drop on Tsemiradsky? Super talented artist. I feel like he's one of those dudes we would know better if not for the Iron Curtain making it unfashionable to study Russian stuff.
https://www.google.com/search?q=semiradsky&espv=2&biw=950&bih=934&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=9SaCVJbxMYbvoASt9YKwBQ&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ
Oscar, I love this artist. Lots of ways to spend his name. Master of dappled light.
Rich, you make a most important observation. The truly great artists are not slaves to their reference. To me, this is one of the major factors that differentiate "copyists" from real artists.
Thank you
Post a Comment